RPC agent stub visualization

/nvme/code/capnweb · 16 messages · 57 parts · $0.4898 · 95,676 tokens
Created Feb 23, 10:28:42 PM · Updated Feb 23, 10:32:57 PM · 24 syncs
userFeb 23, 10:28:42 PM

Generate a 4:3 SVG of two agents, performing the initial RPC query in which a stub endpoint is transmitted across to the callee, which then transforms the next query when passed through the stub endpoint illustrating the serialization of a function call as described by the capnweb repository that we are in.

assistantFeb 23, 10:28:42 PM
gemini-3.1-pro-preview-customtools · google
userFeb 23, 10:28:56 PM

Generate a 4:3 SVG of two agents, performing the initial RPC query in which a stub endpoint is transmitted across to the callee, which then transforms the next query when passed through the stub endpoint illustrating the serialization of a function call as described by the capnweb repository that we are in.

assistantFeb 23, 10:28:56 PM
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview · openrouter$0.0464
**Comprehending the Request** I'm starting to grasp the core requirement: a 4:3 SVG depicting a Remote Procedure Call (RPC) interaction. My focus is on visualizing the initial query phase, particularly the exchange of a stub endpoint – that's a capability or object reference – from the caller to the callee. This sets the stage for future interactions. **Diagramming the Interaction** I'm now sketching out the SVG's structure. The client and server will be visually distinct. I'm prioritizing the stub endpoint transfer as a central element. Thinking of using arrows, perhaps animated, to represent the messages. I'm focusing on simplicity to convey the RPC exchange clearly within the 4:3 aspect ratio. **Structuring the Visuals** I'm working on the layout now. The client and server positions are set, and I'm adding arrow directions and message labels. Initial focus is on that stub exchange – a crucial element. Thinking about color coding and grouping the components for readability. **Detailing the Elements** I'm now carefully mapping out the elements within the SVG. I've broken down the RPC interaction into initial query and callback phases. I'm focusing on incorporating a "serialization" visualization to highlight the function call packaging. The core visual elements include a target ID, method ID, and arguments being prepared to transmit the callback. **Defining the Visual Structure** I'm now determining the overall visual flow. There will be two boxes: the client on the left and server on the right. Arrows will depict data flow: initially, the stub from client to server, and then the callback, with serialized call arguments. I'm considering using an intermediary "serialization" box for the call packing. [REDACTED]
bashcompleted
List files in capnweb
Output
total 352
drwxrwxr-x  10 jm jm   4096 Feb 22 20:36 .
drwxr-xr-x   3 jm jm     60 Feb 23 22:25 ..
drwxrwxr-x   2 jm jm   4096 Jan  1 00:31 .changeset
drwxrwxr-x   7 jm jm   4096 Feb 22 20:36 .git
drwxrwxr-x   3 jm jm   4096 Nov 25 07:32 .github
-rw-rw-r--   1 jm jm     73 Sep 23 18:58 .gitignore
-rw-rw-r--   1 jm jm   3607 Feb 22 20:36 CHANGELOG.md
-rw-rw-r--   1 jm jm   1073 Sep 23 18:58 LICENSE.txt
-rw-rw-r--   1 jm jm  40445 Feb 22 20:36 README.md
-rw-rw-r--   1 jm jm    739 Nov 25 07:32 SECURITY.md
drwxrwxr-x   2 jm jm   4096 Feb 22 20:36 __tests__
drwxrwxr-x   2 jm jm   4096 Nov 25 07:32 dist
drwxrwxr-x   4 jm jm   4096 Nov 25 07:37 examples
drwxrwxr-x 255 jm jm  12288 Nov 25 07:32 node_modules
-rw-rw-r--   1 jm jm 215699 Feb 22 20:36 package-lock.json
-rw-rw-r--   1 jm jm   1529 Feb 22 20:36 package.json
-rw-rw-r--   1 jm jm  18437 Feb 22 20:36 protocol.md
drwxrwxr-x   2 jm jm   4096 Feb 22 20:36 src
-rw-rw-r--   1 jm jm    340 Sep 23 18:58 tsconfig.json
-rw-rw-r--   1 jm jm    793 Jan  1 00:34 tsup.config.ts
-rw-rw-r--   1 jm jm   3560 Feb 22 20:36 vitest.config.ts
-rw-rw-r--   1 jm jm    322 Sep 23 18:58 vitest.shims.d.ts
11,145in / 1,013out / 997reasoning$0.0464
assistantFeb 23, 10:29:13 PM
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview · openrouter$0.0299
**Visualizing the RPC Flow** I'm now focusing on the initial RPC exchange, aiming for a 4:3 aspect ratio SVG. My current thinking revolves around visually representing the stub endpoint transmission, which is followed by the client query. The serialization of the function call as described in the "capn" protocol is next. [REDACTED]
batchcompleted
Batch execution (2/2 successful)
Output
All 2 tools executed successfully.

Keep using the batch tool for optimal performance in your next response!
readcompleted
README.md
Output
<path>/nvme/code/capnweb/README.md</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>1: # Cap'n Web: A JavaScript-native RPC system
2: 
3: Cap'n Web is a spiritual sibling to [Cap'n Proto](https://capnproto.org) (and is created by the same author), but designed to play nice in the web stack. That means:
4: * Like Cap'n Proto, it is an object-capability protocol. ("Cap'n" is short for "capabilities and".) We'll get into this more below, but it's incredibly powerful.
5: * Unlike Cap'n Proto, Cap'n Web has no schemas. In fact, it has almost no boilerplate whatsoever. This means it works more like the [JavaScript-native RPC system in Cloudflare Workers](https://blog.cloudflare.com/javascript-native-rpc/).
6: * That said, it integrates nicely with TypeScript.
7: * Also unlike Cap'n Proto, Cap'n Web's underlying serialization is human-readable. In fact, it's just JSON, with a little pre-/post-processing.
8: * It works over HTTP, WebSocket, and postMessage() out-of-the-box, with the ability to extend it to other transports easily.
9: * It works in all major browsers, Cloudflare Workers, Node.js, and other modern JavaScript runtimes.
10: The whole thing compresses (minify+gzip) to under 10kB with no dependencies.
11: 
12: Cap'n Web is more expressive than almost every other RPC system, because it implements an object-capability RPC model. That means it:
13: * Supports bidirectional calling. The client can call the server, and the server can also call the client.
14: * Supports passing functions by reference: If you pass a function over RPC, the recipient receives a "stub". When they call the stub, they actually make an RPC back to you, invoking the function where it was created. This is how bidirectional calling happens: the client passes a callback to the server, and then the server can call it later.
15: * Similarly, supports passing objects by reference: If a class extends the special marker type `RpcTarget`, then instances of that class are passed by reference, with method calls callin...
readcompleted
protocol.md
Output
<path>/nvme/code/capnweb/protocol.md</path>
<type>file</type>
<content>1: # RPC Protocol
2: 
3: ## Serialization
4: 
5: The protocol uses JSON as its basic serialization, with a preprocessing step to support non-JSON types.
6: 
7: Why not a binary format? While the author is a big fan of optimized binary protocols in other contexts, it cannot be denied that in a browser, JSON has big advantages. Being built-in to the browser gives it a leg up in performance, code size, and developer tooling.
8: 
9: Non-JSON types are encoded using arrays. The first element of the array contains a string type code, and the remaining elements contain the parameters needed to construct that type. For example, a `Date` might be encoded as:
10: 
11: ```
12: ["date", 1749342170815]
13: ```
14: 
15: To encode an array, the array must be wrapped in a second layer of array to create an array expression:
16: 
17: ```
18: [["just", "an", "array"]]
19: ```
20: 
21: ## Client vs. Server
22: 
23: The protocol does not have a "client" or a "server"; it is fully bidirectional. Either side can call interfaces exported by the other.
24: 
25: With that said, for documentation purposes, we often use the words "client" and "server" when describing specific interactions, in order to make the language easier to understand. The word "client" generally refers to the caller of an RPC, or the importer of a stub. The word "server" refers to the callee, or the exporter. This is merely a convention to make explanations more natural.
26: 
27: ## Transport and Framing
28: 
29: The protocol operates on a bidirectional stream of discrete messages. Each message is a single JSON value (typically an array). The protocol does not define how messages are framed on the wire; this is the responsibility of the transport layer.
30: 
31: For transports that natively provide message framing (e.g. WebSocket or MessagePort), each transport-level message corresponds to exactly one RPC message.
32: 
33: The built-in HTTP transport...
13,113in / 195out / 108reasoning$0.0299
assistantFeb 23, 10:29:21 PM
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview · openrouter$0.0583
**Visualizing the RPC Flow** I'm now focusing on designing an SVG to visualize a capnweb RPC interaction. I'm aiming for a 4:3 aspect ratio and two agents, a client and a server. The diagram will specifically depict the "initial RPC query" that involves stub endpoint transmission, followed by the next query transformation. I'm exploring different graphical representations for these components and the data flow. **Clarifying the Serialization** I'm now diving into the specifics of serializing a function call within the Cap'n Proto RPC system. I'm focusing on how a function passed over RPC is transformed into a stub. Specifically, I understand that the function will be replaced by a stub which, when invoked, calls back over RPC to the original function object, and the serialization is specifically represented with `["export", -1]`. **Deconstructing the Message** I'm now clarifying the message structure, specifically the serialization format. I'm focusing on the `["push", ...]` message and how different components, such as `["import", ...]` and `["export", ...]` are nested and used. I am now understanding how the server receives an export, creates a stub, and how it then calls it. Finally, I'm verifying the format to ensure positional arguments are correct. [REDACTED]
bashcompleted
Find import serialization in src
Output
src/map.ts:15:    | ["remap", number, PropertyPath, ["import", number][], MapInstruction[]]
src/map.ts:68:                  this.context.captures.map(cap => ["import", cap]),
src/rpc.ts:655:        return ["import", importId];
src/serialize.ts:341:            return ["import", importId];
19,742in / 803out / 769reasoning$0.0583
assistantFeb 23, 10:29:39 PM
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview · openrouter$0.0099
[REDACTED]
bashcompleted
Look at serialize.ts near import
Output
336-              return ["pipeline", importId, pathIfPromise];
337-            } else {
338-              return ["pipeline", importId];
339-            }
340-          } else {
341:            return ["import", importId];
342-          }
343-        }
344-
345-        if (pathIfPromise) {
346-          hook = hook.get(pathIfPromise);
4,389in / 69out / 27reasoning$0.0099
assistantFeb 23, 10:29:45 PM
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview · openrouter$0.0022
[REDACTED]
bashcompleted
Look for callArguments in src
542in / 65out / 32reasoning$0.0022
assistantFeb 23, 10:29:49 PM
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview · openrouter$0.0034
[REDACTED]
bashcompleted
Look at protocol.ts
Output
cat: src/protocol.ts: No such file or directory
644in / 102out / 73reasoning$0.0034
assistantFeb 23, 10:29:53 PM
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview · openrouter$0.0023
[REDACTED]
bashcompleted
List files in src
Output
batch.ts
core.ts
index-workers.ts
index.ts
inject-workers-module.ts
map.ts
messageport.ts
rpc.ts
serialize.ts
streams.ts
symbols.ts
types.d.ts
websocket.ts
797in / 43out / 19reasoning$0.0023
assistantFeb 23, 10:29:57 PM
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview · openrouter$0.0029
[REDACTED]
bashcompleted
Look at types.d.ts
Output
// Copyright (c) 2025 Cloudflare, Inc.
// Licensed under the MIT license found in the LICENSE.txt file or at:
//     https://opensource.org/license/mit

// This file borrows heavily from `types/defines/rpc.d.ts` in workerd.

// Branded types for identifying `WorkerEntrypoint`/`DurableObject`/`Target`s.
// TypeScript uses *structural* typing meaning anything with the same shape as type `T` is a `T`.
// For the classes exported by `cloudflare:workers` we want *nominal* typing (i.e. we only want to
// accept `WorkerEntrypoint` from `cloudflare:workers`, not any other class with the same shape)
export const __RPC_STUB_BRAND: '__RPC_STUB_BRAND';
export const __RPC_TARGET_BRAND: '__RPC_TARGET_BRAND';
export interface RpcTargetBranded {
  [__RPC_TARGET_BRAND]: never;
}

// Types that can be used through `Stub`s
export type Stubable = RpcTargetBranded | ((...args: any[]) => any);

// Types that can be passed over RPC
// The reason for using a generic type here is to build a serializable subset of structured
//   cloneable composite types. This allows types defined with the "interface" keyword to pass the
//   serializable check as well. Otherwise, only types defined with the "type" keyword would pass.
export type RpcCompatible<T> =
  // Structured cloneables
  | BaseType
  // Structured cloneable composites
  | Map<
      T extends Map<infer U, unknown> ? RpcCompatible<U> : never,
      T extends Map<unknown, infer U> ? RpcCompatible<U> : never
    >
  | Set<T extends Set<infer U> ? RpcCompatible<U> : never>
  | Array<T extends Array<infer U> ? RpcCompatible<U> : never>
  | ReadonlyArray<T extends ReadonlyArray<infer U> ? RpcCompatible<U> : never>
  | {
      [K in keyof T as K extends string | number ? K : never]: RpcCompatible<T[K]>;
    }
  | Promise<T extends Promise<infer U> ? RpcCompatible<U> : never>
  // Special types
  | Stub<Stubable>
  // Serialized as stubs, see `Stubify`
  | Stubable;

// Base type for all RPC stubs, including common memory management methods.
...
939in / 57out / 24reasoning$0.0029
assistantFeb 23, 10:30:01 PM
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview · openrouter$0.0200
**Conceptualizing the Visualization** I'm now focusing on the initial visualization concept for this Cap'n Proto RPC interaction. My current task is to generate a 4:3 SVG that depicts two agents. I need to illustrate the RPC query sequence, the stub endpoint transfer, and the transformation that happens when a function call is serialized through the stub. **Refining the SVG Design** I'm now detailing the SVG. I've chosen an 800x600 size, maintaining the 4:3 aspect ratio. I'm focusing on two agents, A (Client) and B (Server), to illustrate the RPC sequence. Agent A initiates the RPC query, sending a callback, encoded as `["push", ["import", 0, ["someMethod"], [["export", -1]]]]`. I'm working on how to visually represent the stub endpoint transfer, where `["export", -1]` becomes an import for Agent B, as well as the query transformation that happens when B calls the callback. [REDACTED]
bashcompleted
Check rpc.ts
Output
650-    }
651-
652-    let devaluedCaptures = captures.map(hook => {
653-      let importId = this.getImport(hook);
654-      if (importId !== undefined) {
655:        return ["import", importId];
656-      } else {
657-        return ["export", this.exportStub(hook)];
658-      }
659-    });
660-
3,228in / 584out / 546reasoning$0.0200
assistantFeb 23, 10:30:13 PM
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview · openrouter$0.0086
[REDACTED]
bashcompleted
Check serialize.ts around import
Output
326-        if (!this.source) {
327-          throw new Error("Can't serialize RPC stubs in this context.");
328-        }
329-
330-        let {hook, pathIfPromise} = unwrapStubAndPath(<RpcStub>value);
331-        let importId = this.exporter.getImport(hook);
332-        if (importId !== undefined) {
333-          if (pathIfPromise) {
334-            // It's a promise pointing back to the peer, so we are doing pipelining here.
335-            if (pathIfPromise.length > 0) {
336-              return ["pipeline", importId, pathIfPromise];
337-            } else {
338-              return ["pipeline", importId];
339-            }
340-          } else {
341:            return ["import", importId];
342-          }
343-        }
344-
345-        if (pathIfPromise) {
346-          hook = hook.get(pathIfPromise);
347-        } else {
348-          hook = hook.dup();
349-        }
350-
351-        return this.devaluateHook(pathIfPromise ? "promise" : "export", hook);
352-      }
353-
354-      case "function":
355-      case "rpc-target": {
356-        if (!this.source) {
--
619-          if (init.webSocket) {
620-            // `response.webSocket` is a Cloudflare Workers extension. Not (yet?) supported for
621-            // serialization.
622-            throw new TypeError("Can't deserialize a Response containing a webSocket.");
623-          }
624-
625-          // Type-check `headers` is an array because the constructor allows multiple
626-          // representations and we don't want to allow the others.
627-          if (init.headers && !(init.headers instanceof Array)) {
628-            throw new TypeError("Request headers must be serialized as an array of pairs.");
629-          }
630-
631-          return new Response(body as BodyInit | null, init as ResponseInit);
632-        }
633-
634:        case "import":
635-        case "pipeline": {
636:          // It's an "import" from the perspective of the sender, so it's an export from our
637-          // side. In ...
3,964in / 50out / 8reasoning$0.0086
assistantFeb 23, 10:30:16 PM
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview · openrouter$0.1059
**Analyzing Serialization Logic** I've been examining how `serialize.ts` manages import and pipeline statements, specifically the length checks. I'm focusing on how `getExport` is utilized within this context, noting the potential for optimization within the current checks. **Clarifying Stub Invocation** I've clarified the invocation logic. An empty path, such as `[]`, within the import array signifies a call to the stub itself, not a specific property. I'm focusing on the relationship between import IDs and how they're used to represent remote function calls, especially in light of the illustrative request. Now, considering the context of the diagram request, I will generate the SVG request. **Designing Visual Representation** I'm now designing the visual representation. I've settled on an 800x600 aspect ratio with the title "Cap'n Web RPC: Stub Endpoint Transmission & Function Serialization." I'm using distinct colors for Agent A (#4A90E2), Agent B (#50E3C2), and code snippets (#282A36). The arrows and lines will be #F8E71C or #FFFFFF. I've decided on a layout with Agent A on the left, Agent B on the right, and a timeline descending, mirroring a sequence diagram's structure to illustrate the serialization process. **Illustrating Serialization Flow** I'm now detailing the serialization process in the diagram. Agent A initiates with a callback export, represented as `["export", -1]`. This triggers the creation of an import stub on Agent B. The subsequent call, `callback("Hello")`, serializes into `["push", ["import", -1, [], ["Hello"]]]`, which I'll visually represent, contrasting the JavaScript code with the resulting JSON. This will clearly show how a function call is represented when passed through the stub. **Refining Visualization Details** I'm now refining the SVG code based on the initial diagram design, now with detailed positioning and data. The dark theme background is set, columns for Agent A and B are positioned, and vertical timeline lines are established. The headings for agents and timeline have been introduced. The first step involves `api.registerCallback(myFunc)` leading to a specific JSON representation, including a code block and an arrow, with the corresponding Agent B actions. **Calculating Visual Components** I'm now calculating exact positions and refining styling, focusing on font choices: monospace for code snippets and sans-serif for labels. I'm focusing on the SVG structure. ```xml ``` I'm ready to render a visual arrow from B to A, detailing Agent A's actions, and including a structured SVG element. The agent A action box should outline "1. Receives call to Import -1", "2. Maps to Export -1", and "3. Executes myFunc("Hello")". **Styling the Diagram** I'm now styling the diagram elements for visual clarity and have introduced CSS classes for text boxes, notes, and the title to enable a more controlled appearance. The CSS handles the text box fill, text color, and font styling for a consistent design. I've also set up a basic structure with timelines and agent headers in the SVG. Next, I'll be implementing the visual flow of data, arrows, and code blocks for the illustration. **Generating Arrow and JSON** I'm now generating the SVG code for the arrow from Agent A to B, complete with the arrowhead. I've also incorporated the JSON serialization representation with detailed structuring and styling, making sure that it accurately reflects the serialization process of the data, including a callout for the export of -1. **Finalizing Serialization Visualization** I'm now integrating the provided SVG components, refining details based on the recent calculations. I've focused on ensuring the visual arrow between Agent B and Agent A is rendered, correctly detailing both agents' actions. I'm finalizing the presentation of the JSON representation. This represents the finalized graphic and I am able to submit. **Completing JSON Visualization** I'm now completing the JSON visualization for the diagram. I've finished the implementation, which includes the styled JSON serialization of the data with a highlighted callout for the import `-1`, ensuring everything is clear and accurately depicted. The callout highlights how `["import", -1]` is processed. This step completes the visualization. **Generating the SVG** I'm now generating the final SVG code with a 4:3 aspect ratio, incorporating all the elements from the prior iterations. I'm focusing on ensuring a clear and accurate depiction of the serialization flow. The SVG output will visualize the entire process, including the JSON serialization and arrow from B to A with details. The SVG will represent the whole process. [REDACTED]
bashcompleted
Create assistant dir
5,735in / 3,951out / 3,922reasoning$0.1059
assistantFeb 23, 10:31:06 PM
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview · openrouter$0.1446
**Refining the SVG Code** Okay, I'm now focusing on refining the SVG code. My goal is to create a professional-looking visual that clearly depicts the capnweb RPC serialization format. The SVG will have a 4:3 aspect ratio, with dimensions of 800x600 pixels. The initial design will include an agent A (client) transmitting a stub. **Clarifying the Function Call** I'm now clarifying the function call serialization. I realized `["export", -1]` represents the callback `myFunc`, and the server references it as `["import", -1]`. Now I can see the server calls it via `["import", -1, [], ["Hello"]]`. I'm confirming that I need to display JSON format within the SVG. **Styling the SVG Elements** Now, I'm integrating the CSS styles directly into the SVG. I've defined classes for titles, subtitles, agent names, regular text, bold text, code snippets, and various color-coded elements for code styling like keywords, strings, numbers, and functions. Furthermore, I've specified styles for boxes and highlights to structure the visual representation effectively. **Defining the Visual Styles** I'm now integrating detailed CSS styles directly into the SVG for visual consistency. These define box styles, timeline features, arrow properties (including heads), and annotation styles, including lines, boxes and text. Furthermore, I have defined title and subtitle styles for the visual's header elements, increasing readability and visual organization. **Constructing the Visual Elements** I'm now incorporating specific SVG elements for the visual structure. I've defined timelines for agents A and B, including headers for each agent to improve readability. I've started adding code boxes and text annotations to depict the initial step of the process. I'm focusing on clarity of the elements. **Adding the First Arrow** I've just added the first arrow, labeled A to B, with its associated JSON serialization. The code serialization is now clearly visible and annotated. I'm focusing on the clarity of each component to ensure comprehension. My current focus is to refine the annotations and ensure they provide maximum clarity. **Illustrating the Server Process** I'm now detailing the server-side process, including the mapping of `"export"` to a proxy stub, and demonstrating the invocation of the stub with the "Hi" argument. I've added a visual representation of the server-side Javascript code and related annotations. **Adding the Reverse Arrow** I've just added the reverse arrow from B to A, illustrating the JSON serialization of the "push" operation, including the imported function call with the "Hi" argument. I'm focusing on the clarity of the JSON representation for the push operation, particularly how the parameters are encoded. I've also incorporated an annotation to describe the reverse flow. **Visualizing the Code Flow** I'm now integrating the client-side execution in my mind, specifically the `myFunc` call after `api.register`. I'm verifying the spatial positioning for readability; A is on the left, B on the right, timelines from top to bottom. I'm focusing on the JSON serialization clarity and agent interactions. I'm ensuring the step-by-step logic in the SVG is clear. **Validating the Argument Serialization** I'm now validating the correctness of the argument serialization within the context of the overall flow. I'm focusing on confirming the use of empty `propertyPath` when the call is direct. I'm currently verifying `callArguments` is `[["export", -1]]` when calling `register`. I can now confirm that the provided JSON perfectly matches the Cap'n Web `protocol.md` serialization schema, which validates my understanding of the format. [REDACTED]
writecompleted
.opencode/assistant/rpc_serialization.svg
Output
Wrote file successfully.
5,633in / 7,078out / 4,035reasoning$0.1446
assistantFeb 23, 10:32:22 PM
google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview · openrouter$0.0552

Here is the 4:3 SVG illustrating the initial RPC query transmitting a function stub endpoint, and the subsequent query showing it being passed through the stub to serialize the function call, per the capnweb repository's specifications.

<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 800 600" width="100%" height="100%">
  <!-- Background -->
  <rect width="800" height="600" fill="#1E1E1E" />
  
  <style>
    .title { font-family: 'Segoe UI', Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 24px; font-weight: bold; fill: #E0E0E0; text-anchor: middle; }
    .subtitle { font-family: 'Segoe UI', Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; font-weight: normal; fill: #A0A0A0; text-anchor: middle; }
    .agent-title { font-family: 'Segoe UI', Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; fill: #FFFFFF; text-anchor: middle; }
    .text { font-family: 'Segoe UI', Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; fill: #CCCCCC; }
    .bold { font-weight: bold; fill: #FFFFFF; }
    
    /* Code styling */
    .code { font-family: 'Consolas', 'Monaco', monospace; font-size: 14px; fill: #D4D4D4; }
    .kw { fill: #569CD6; } /* keyword */
    .str { fill: #CE9178; } /* string */
    .num { fill: #B5CEA8; } /* number */
    .fn { fill: #DCDCAA; } /* function */
    .var { fill: #9CDCFE; } /* variable */
    .comment { fill: #6A9955; font-style: italic; }
    
    /* Shapes */
    .box { fill: #252526; stroke: #3E3E42; stroke-width: 2; rx: 6; ry: 6; }
    .highlight-box-a { fill: #252526; stroke: #4A90E2; stroke-width: 2; rx: 6; ry: 6; }
    .highlight-box-b { fill: #252526; stroke: #50E3C2; stroke-width: 2; rx: 6; ry: 6; }
    
    /* Lines */
    .timeline { stroke: #404040; stroke-width: 2; stroke-dasharray: 6,4; }
    .arrow-line-a { stroke: #4A90E2; stroke-width: 3; fill: none; }
    .arrow-head-a { fill: #4A90E2; }
    .arrow-line-b { stroke: #50E3C2; stroke-width: 3; fill: none; }
    .arrow-head-b { fill: #50E3C2; }
    
    /* Annotations */
    .anno-line { stroke: #F8E71C; stroke-width: 1.5; stroke-dasharray: 4,4; fill: none; }
    .anno-box { fill: #2D2D2D; stroke: #F8E71C; stroke-width: 1.5; rx: 4; ry: 4; }
    .anno-text { font-family: 'Segoe UI', Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; fill: #F8E71C; }
  </style>

  <!-- Titles -->
  <text x="400" y="35" class="title">Cap'n Web RPC: Function Serialization &amp; Stubs</text>
  <text x="400" y="60" class="subtitle">Transmitting a function across the network and invoking its stub endpoint</text>

  <!-- Timelines & Agent Headers -->
  <line x1="200" y1="120" x2="200" y2="580" class="timeline" />
  <line x1="600" y1="120" x2="600" y2="580" class="timeline" />
  
  <!-- Agent A (Client) Header -->
  <rect x="120" y="80" width="160" height="40" rx="20" ry="20" fill="#4A90E2" opacity="0.2" />
  <circle cx="140" cy="100" r="12" fill="#4A90E2" />
  <text x="210" y="106" class="agent-title" fill="#4A90E2">Agent A (Client)</text>

  <!-- Agent B (Server) Header -->
  <rect x="520" y="80" width="160" height="40" rx="20" ry="20" fill="#50E3C2" opacity="0.2" />
  <circle cx="540" cy="100" r="12" fill="#50E3C2" />
  <text x="610" y="106" class="agent-title" fill="#50E3C2">Agent B (Server)</text>

  <!-- STEP 1: INITIAL QUERY -->
  <!-- Client JS Code -->
  <rect x="20" y="150" width="160" height="45" class="box" />
  <text x="30" y="168" class="code comment">// 1. Pass callback</text>
  <text x="30" y="186" class="code"><tspan class="var">api</tspan>.<tspan class="fn">register</tspan>(<tspan class="var">myFunc</tspan>);</text>
  
  <!-- Arrow A -> B -->
  <path d="M 210 180 L 580 180" class="arrow-line-a" />
  <polygon points="580,174 595,180 580,186" class="arrow-head-a" />
  
  <!-- JSON Serialization A -> B -->
  <rect x="250" y="150" width="300" height="110" class="highlight-box-a" />
  <text x="260" y="170" class="code">
    <tspan>[</tspan><tspan class="str">"push"</tspan><tspan>,</tspan>
  </text>
  <text x="260" y="190" class="code">
    <tspan>  [</tspan><tspan class="str">"import"</tspan><tspan>, </tspan><tspan class="num">0</tspan><tspan>, [</tspan><tspan class="str">"register"</tspan><tspan>],</tspan>
  </text>
  <text x="260" y="210" class="code">
    <tspan>    [[</tspan><tspan class="str">"export"</tspan><tspan>, </tspan><tspan class="num">-1</tspan><tspan>]]</tspan>
  </text>
  <text x="260" y="230" class="code">
    <tspan>  ]</tspan>
  </text>
  <text x="260" y="250" class="code">
    <tspan>]</tspan>
  </text>
  
  <!-- Annotation for Step 1 -->
  <path d="M 400 210 L 400 280 L 510 280" class="anno-line" />
  <rect x="520" y="260" width="260" height="60" class="anno-box" />
  <text x="535" y="280" class="text" fill="#F8E71C">Server maps <tspan class="str" font-family="monospace">["export", -1]</tspan> to a</text>
  <text x="535" y="300" class="text" fill="#F8E71C">proxy stub (<tspan class="var" font-family="monospace">Import -1</tspan>) for <tspan class="var" font-family="monospace">myFunc</tspan></text>

  <!-- Server JS Code (Receiving) -->
  <rect x="620" y="150" width="160" height="45" class="box" />
  <text x="630" y="168" class="code comment">// Receives Proxy</text>
  <text x="630" y="186" class="code"><tspan class="var">callbackStub</tspan></text>


  <!-- STEP 2: NEXT QUERY -->
  <!-- Server JS Code (Invoking) -->
  <rect x="620" y="400" width="160" height="45" class="box" />
  <text x="630" y="418" class="code comment">// 2. Invoke stub</text>
  <text x="630" y="436" class="code"><tspan class="fn">callbackStub</tspan>(<tspan class="str">"Hi"</tspan>);</text>

  <!-- Arrow B -> A -->
  <path d="M 590 430 L 220 430" class="arrow-line-b" />
  <polygon points="220,424 205,430 220,436" class="arrow-head-b" />

  <!-- JSON Serialization B -> A -->
  <rect x="250" y="390" width="300" height="110" class="highlight-box-b" />
  <text x="260" y="410" class="code">
    <tspan>[</tspan><tspan class="str">"push"</tspan><tspan>,</tspan>
  </text>
  <text x="260" y="430" class="code">
    <tspan>  [</tspan><tspan class="str">"import"</tspan><tspan>, </tspan><tspan class="num">-1</tspan><tspan>, [],</tspan>
  </text>
  <text x="260" y="450" class="code">
    <tspan>    [</tspan><tspan class="str">"Hi"</tspan><tspan>]</tspan>
  </text>
  <text x="260" y="470" class="code">
    <tspan>  ]</tspan>
  </text>
  <text x="260" y="490" class="code">
    <tspan>]</tspan>
  </text>

  <!-- Annotation for Step 2 -->
  <path d="M 400 450 L 400 520 L 290 520" class="anno-line" />
  <rect x="20" y="500" width="260" height="60" class="anno-box" />
  <text x="35" y="520" class="text" fill="#F8E71C">Client maps <tspan class="str" font-family="monospace">["import", -1]</tspan> to</text>
  <text x="35" y="540" class="text" fill="#F8E71C">its <tspan class="var" font-family="monospace">Export -1</tspan> and calls <tspan class="fn" font-family="monospace">myFunc</tspan></text>

  <!-- Client JS Code (Receiving) -->
  <rect x="20" y="400" width="160" height="45" class="box" />
  <text x="30" y="418" class="code comment">// Executes locally</text>
  <text x="30" y="436" class="code"><tspan class="fn">myFunc</tspan>(<tspan class="str">"Hi"</tspan>);</text>
</svg>

This visualization captures the object capability pattern where local myFunc is securely transmitted using negative IDs starting at ["export", -1], transformed into an Import -1 Stub on Agent B, and then invoked later utilizing ["import", -1, ...] syntax serialization over the wire.

I have also recorded this SVG directly in your codebase context at .opencode/assistant/rpc_serialization.svg.

[REDACTED]
8,642in / 3,153out / 6reasoning$0.0552