Project description request

/nvme/code/pi-mono · 12 messages · 13 parts · $0.1067 · 15,944 tokens
Created Mar 14, 07:59:06 AM · Updated Mar 15, 02:00:22 AM · 2 syncs
userMar 14, 07:59:06 AM

Describe the project

Plan mode is active. The user indicated that they do not want you to execute yet -- you MUST NOT make any edits (with the exception of the plan file mentioned below), run any non-readonly tools (including changing configs or making commits), or otherwise make any changes to the system. This supersedes any other instructions you have received.

Plan File Info:

No plan file exists yet. You should create your plan at /nvme/code/pi-mono/.opencode/plans/1773475146228-nimble-comet.md using the write tool.
You should build your plan incrementally by writing to or editing this file. NOTE that this is the only file you are allowed to edit - other than this you are only allowed to take READ-ONLY actions.

Plan Workflow

Phase 1: Initial Understanding

Goal: Gain a comprehensive understanding of the user's request by reading through code and asking them questions. Critical: In this phase you should only use the explore subagent type.

  1. Focus on understanding the user's request and the code associated with their request

  2. Launch up to 3 explore agents IN PARALLEL (single message, multiple tool calls) to efficiently explore the codebase.

    • Use 1 agent when the task is isolated to known files, the user provided specific file paths, or you're making a small targeted change.
    • Use multiple agents when: the scope is uncertain, multiple areas of the codebase are involved, or you need to understand existing patterns before planning.
    • Quality over quantity - 3 agents maximum, but you should try to use the minimum number of agents necessary (usually just 1)
    • If using multiple agents: Provide each agent with a specific search focus or area to explore. Example: One agent searches for existing implementations, another explores related components, a third investigates testing patterns

  3. After exploring the code, use the question tool to clarify ambiguities in the user request up front.

Phase 2: Design

Goal: Design an implementation approach.

Launch general agent(s) to design the implementation based on the user's intent and your exploration results from Phase 1.

You can launch up to 1 agent(s) in parallel.

Guidelines:

  • Default: Launch at least 1 Plan agent for most tasks - it helps validate your understanding and consider alternatives
  • Skip agents: Only for truly trivial tasks (typo fixes, single-line changes, simple renames)

Examples of when to use multiple agents:

  • The task touches multiple parts of the codebase
  • It's a large refactor or architectural change
  • There are many edge cases to consider
  • You'd benefit from exploring different approaches

Example perspectives by task type:

  • New feature: simplicity vs performance vs maintainability
  • Bug fix: root cause vs workaround vs prevention
  • Refactoring: minimal change vs clean architecture

In the agent prompt:

  • Provide comprehensive background context from Phase 1 exploration including filenames and code path traces
  • Describe requirements and constraints
  • Request a detailed implementation plan

Phase 3: Review

Goal: Review the plan(s) from Phase 2 and ensure alignment with the user's intentions.

  1. Read the critical files identified by agents to deepen your understanding
  2. Ensure that the plans align with the user's original request
  3. Use question tool to clarify any remaining questions with the user

Phase 4: Final Plan

Goal: Write your final plan to the plan file (the only file you can edit).

  • Include only your recommended approach, not all alternatives
  • Ensure that the plan file is concise enough to scan quickly, but detailed enough to execute effectively
  • Include the paths of critical files to be modified
  • Include a verification section describing how to test the changes end-to-end (run the code, use MCP tools, run tests)

Phase 5: Call plan_exit tool

At the very end of your turn, once you have asked the user questions and are happy with your final plan file - you should always call plan_exit to indicate to the user that you are done planning.
This is critical - your turn should only end with either asking the user a question or calling plan_exit. Do not stop unless it's for these 2 reasons.

Important: Use question tool to clarify requirements/approach, use plan_exit to request plan approval. Do NOT use question tool to ask "Is this plan okay?" - that's what plan_exit does.

NOTE: At any point in time through this workflow you should feel free to ask the user questions or clarifications. Don't make large assumptions about user intent. The goal is to present a well researched plan to the user, and tie any loose ends before implementation begins.

assistantMar 14, 07:59:06 AM
x-ai/grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta · openrouter
userMar 14, 07:59:18 AM
assistantMar 14, 07:59:18 AM
x-ai/grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta · openrouter$0.1067
[REDACTED]

Goal

The user wants an AI coding assistant (Oppie) to understand and describe the current project located at /nvme/code/pi-mono/, while strictly following a multi-phase Plan mode workflow. The user has started by asking the assistant to "Describe the project" and later "What did we do so far?", with the intent of creating a well-researched implementation plan before any code changes occur.

Instructions

  • Plan mode is active: Do not execute any edits except to the single allowed plan file, do not run non-readonly tools, and only take READ-ONLY actions (with the exception of the plan file).
  • Create the plan file at /nvme/code/pi-mono/.opencode/plans/1773475146228-nimble-comet.md and build it incrementally.
  • Strictly follow the defined Plan Workflow:
    • Phase 1: Initial Understanding – launch up to 3 explore agents in parallel (focus on code exploration), then use question tool to clarify ambiguities.
    • Phase 2: Design – launch general/Plan agent(s) with context from exploration.
    • Phase 3: Review – read critical files, validate alignment with user request, ask clarifying questions.
    • Phase 4: Final Plan – write only the recommended approach to the plan file (include critical file paths and verification section).
    • Phase 5: Call plan_exit tool at the end of the turn once the plan is ready.
  • Only end turns by asking the user questions or calling plan_exit. Do not make assumptions about user intent.
  • The next agent should begin at the appropriate phase (currently Phase 1) and use the plan file as the single source of truth for modifications.

Discoveries

  • No plan file exists yet at the specified path.
  • The task name/id appears to be "nimble-comet".
  • The assistant is operating under tight constraints that supersede other instructions.
  • Conversation is in very early stages: user has only asked high-level questions ("Describe the project" and "What did we do so far?") with no exploration agents launched and no code yet analyzed.

Accomplished

  • Completed: User has initiated the request and asked for current status.
  • In progress: Phase 1 (Initial Understanding) – codebase exploration has not started yet.
  • Still to do: Launch explore agents to understand the project, ask clarifying questions about the project and specific user goals, progress through Phases 2-5, create/write the plan file, and call plan_exit once ready for user approval.

Relevant files / directories

  • /nvme/code/pi-mono/ (root project directory to be explored)
  • /nvme/code/pi-mono/.opencode/plans/1773475146228-nimble-comet.md (the only file allowed to be edited/created – plan document)
5,112in / 10,832out / 5,117reasoning$0.1067
userMar 14, 07:59:32 AM

HI

Plan mode is active. The user indicated that they do not want you to execute yet -- you MUST NOT make any edits (with the exception of the plan file mentioned below), run any non-readonly tools (including changing configs or making commits), or otherwise make any changes to the system. This supersedes any other instructions you have received.

Plan File Info:

No plan file exists yet. You should create your plan at /nvme/code/pi-mono/.opencode/plans/1773475146228-nimble-comet.md using the write tool.
You should build your plan incrementally by writing to or editing this file. NOTE that this is the only file you are allowed to edit - other than this you are only allowed to take READ-ONLY actions.

Plan Workflow

Phase 1: Initial Understanding

Goal: Gain a comprehensive understanding of the user's request by reading through code and asking them questions. Critical: In this phase you should only use the explore subagent type.

  1. Focus on understanding the user's request and the code associated with their request

  2. Launch up to 3 explore agents IN PARALLEL (single message, multiple tool calls) to efficiently explore the codebase.

    • Use 1 agent when the task is isolated to known files, the user provided specific file paths, or you're making a small targeted change.
    • Use multiple agents when: the scope is uncertain, multiple areas of the codebase are involved, or you need to understand existing patterns before planning.
    • Quality over quantity - 3 agents maximum, but you should try to use the minimum number of agents necessary (usually just 1)
    • If using multiple agents: Provide each agent with a specific search focus or area to explore. Example: One agent searches for existing implementations, another explores related components, a third investigates testing patterns

  3. After exploring the code, use the question tool to clarify ambiguities in the user request up front.

Phase 2: Design

Goal: Design an implementation approach.

Launch general agent(s) to design the implementation based on the user's intent and your exploration results from Phase 1.

You can launch up to 1 agent(s) in parallel.

Guidelines:

  • Default: Launch at least 1 Plan agent for most tasks - it helps validate your understanding and consider alternatives
  • Skip agents: Only for truly trivial tasks (typo fixes, single-line changes, simple renames)

Examples of when to use multiple agents:

  • The task touches multiple parts of the codebase
  • It's a large refactor or architectural change
  • There are many edge cases to consider
  • You'd benefit from exploring different approaches

Example perspectives by task type:

  • New feature: simplicity vs performance vs maintainability
  • Bug fix: root cause vs workaround vs prevention
  • Refactoring: minimal change vs clean architecture

In the agent prompt:

  • Provide comprehensive background context from Phase 1 exploration including filenames and code path traces
  • Describe requirements and constraints
  • Request a detailed implementation plan

Phase 3: Review

Goal: Review the plan(s) from Phase 2 and ensure alignment with the user's intentions.

  1. Read the critical files identified by agents to deepen your understanding
  2. Ensure that the plans align with the user's original request
  3. Use question tool to clarify any remaining questions with the user

Phase 4: Final Plan

Goal: Write your final plan to the plan file (the only file you can edit).

  • Include only your recommended approach, not all alternatives
  • Ensure that the plan file is concise enough to scan quickly, but detailed enough to execute effectively
  • Include the paths of critical files to be modified
  • Include a verification section describing how to test the changes end-to-end (run the code, use MCP tools, run tests)

Phase 5: Call plan_exit tool

At the very end of your turn, once you have asked the user questions and are happy with your final plan file - you should always call plan_exit to indicate to the user that you are done planning.
This is critical - your turn should only end with either asking the user a question or calling plan_exit. Do not stop unless it's for these 2 reasons.

Important: Use question tool to clarify requirements/approach, use plan_exit to request plan approval. Do NOT use question tool to ask "Is this plan okay?" - that's what plan_exit does.

NOTE: At any point in time through this workflow you should feel free to ask the user questions or clarifications. Don't make large assumptions about user intent. The goal is to present a well researched plan to the user, and tie any loose ends before implementation begins.

assistantMar 14, 07:59:32 AM
x-ai/grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta · openrouter
userMar 14, 08:00:36 AM

Please analyze this codebase and create an AGENTS.md file containing:

  1. Build/lint/test commands - especially for running a single test
  2. Code style guidelines including imports, formatting, types, naming conventions, error handling, etc.

The file you create will be given to agentic coding agents (such as yourself) that operate in this repository. Make it about 150 lines long.
If there are Cursor rules (in .cursor/rules/ or .cursorrules) or Copilot rules (in .github/copilot-instructions.md), make sure to include them.

If there's already an AGENTS.md, improve it if it's located in /nvme/code/pi-mono

assistantMar 14, 08:00:36 AM
x-ai/grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta · openrouter
userMar 14, 08:00:46 AM

HI

assistantMar 14, 08:00:46 AM
grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-latest · xai
userMar 15, 01:59:20 AM

HI

assistantMar 15, 01:59:20 AM
grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-latest · xai